Just Shoot Film Photolab
48h turnaroundHand-checkedDensity-correctedPosted UK-wide
← Back to Community
9 October 2026

Who Owns Your Photos? Copyright and Licensing in Plain English

Who Owns Your Photos? Copyright and Licensing in Plain English
Negatives on a light table next to a Contax film camera, with scans on screen. Photo by Jakub Żerdzicki on Unsplash

If you took the photo, you own the copyright. In the UK that's automatic, and it stays yours unless you sign it away. Here's a plain English guide to photo copyright and licensing: what to send, what to keep, and how to give permission in writing, even by email.

A customer messaged me recently with a good problem to have. They'd posted a night shot of an alleyway in town, and it turned out they'd caught a band heading home from their very first gig. The band spotted it and asked for a high res copy.

Fair enough. Then the band said they'd probably like to print it and put it on their Instagram. Suddenly it wasn't such a simple question. Should they pay? Can they do whatever they like with it? What if it ends up on an EP cover?

More and more of you are asking me versions of the same thing, so here's everything in one place.

Who Owns the Copyright to a Photo in the UK?

The person who takes the photo owns the copyright. You don't need to register it, pay for it or stick a © on it. It's yours the moment you press the shutter, and it lasts for your lifetime plus 70 years.

A few things people get wrong:

  • Paying for a photo doesn't buy the copyright. A client who books and pays for a shoot gets to use the photos as agreed, but the copyright stays with you unless you sign it over.
  • Being in the photo doesn't give you the copyright either. The band are in the picture, but the picture is yours.
  • The big exception is work. If you take photos as part of your job, as an employee, your employer usually owns them.
  • Photos taken before 1 August 1989 fall under older rules, where whoever commissioned a photo often owned it. Worth checking if you're dealing with old family or archive pictures.

Copyright vs Licence: The Bit That Matters

Copyright is owning the photo. A licence is permission to use it.

You almost never need to sell your copyright. What you do instead is license it. You say who can use the photo, what for, where, and for how long. You keep ownership, and you can license the same photo to other people too, unless you've promised someone they're the only one. That's called an exclusive licence.

A good licence answers five questions:

  • Who can use it
  • What for (personal use, social media, posters, merch, an album cover, advertising)
  • Where (online, in print, UK only, worldwide)
  • For how long (a year, one campaign, forever)
  • What it costs, and how they credit you

Here's the rule of thumb. Personal use and a credited social media post is usually a favour or a small fee. The same photo on an EP cover, on t-shirts or on gig posters is commercial use, and it's normal to charge properly for that.

Do You Need a Signed Licence Agreement, or Is an Email Enough?

For most everyday situations, an email is enough.

In the UK, a simple non-exclusive licence (permission to use the photo, without promising it to them alone) doesn't need any special form. It can be an email, a message, or even agreed out loud. The problem with agreeing out loud is proving it later, so always get it in writing. An email is ideal. It's dated, and you both have a copy.

You need a proper signed document in two situations:

  • Selling or giving away the copyright itself. This is called an assignment, and the law says it has to be in writing and signed by you.
  • An exclusive licence, where you promise nobody else can use the photo, not even you. To count as exclusive in law, this also has to be in writing and signed by you.

A court in England has accepted that a name at the bottom of an email can count as a signature. Even so, if real money or an exclusive deal is involved, use a proper document signed by both of you. The government's Intellectual Property Office has a free skeleton licence and checklist you can start from. It's in the links at the bottom.

A Simple Terms of Use Email You Can Copy

Here's roughly what I'd send the band in my customer's story. Swap in your own details.

"Hi, the high resolution file is attached. You're welcome to use it for personal use and on the band's social media, as long as you credit me (Photo by Sam Smith, @samshootsfilm) and don't add filters, edit or heavily crop it. I keep the copyright, and I assert my right to be identified as the author of this photo. This doesn't cover commercial use, so if you'd like it on an album or EP cover, merch, posters or adverts, get in touch first and we'll sort out a licence. If you'd like a proper print, I can have one made and signed for you. Could you reply to confirm you're happy with this? Thanks, Sam"

Their reply saying yes is your written agreement. Keep it.

What to Send: Raw Files, Negatives and Scans

Never send your RAW files, and never hand over your negatives.

A RAW file is the digital negative. It's unfinished, and it's not what you want your name attached to. With film, your negatives are the original. They're also the best evidence you have that you took the photo. Owning the negative isn't the same as owning the copyright, but if there's ever a dispute, the person holding the negatives is in a very strong position. Keep them safe.

What you send is the finished image. For screens, a good JPEG is plenty. If someone wants to print it, a full resolution TIFF scan is fine to send, as long as your terms say what they can do with it. Bear in mind a high res scan prints big. Our archival scans comfortably print up to A2, so a file like that has real value.

If a client really insists on RAWs or negatives, that's a different job at a different price. Some photographers will do it, charge a lot more, and put in writing that anything edited by someone else can't be credited to them.

When Clients Edit Your Photos or Add Filters

This one drives photographers mad. You hand over a finished image, and it turns up online with a heavy filter, cropped in half or covered in stickers, with your name underneath.

Your licence is your first line of defence, so spell out what's allowed. A common approach:

  • Cropping to fit a format is fine
  • No filters, colour changes, retouching or adding things to the image
  • Don't remove the credit
  • If they want changes, they ask you and you make them

UK law also gives you moral rights, which stay with you even if you sell the copyright:

  • The right to be credited as the photographer. Oddly, you have to assert this right for it to apply, which just means putting it in writing. That's why the email above includes "I assert my right to be identified as the author of this photo."
  • The right to object to derogatory treatment, meaning changes that distort your photo or harm your reputation. In one UK case, a photographer won against a fashion brand that had used their photo with the background removed, the image flipped and cropped, without permission.

Shooting for Private Clients: Weddings, Portraits and Family Photos

There's a twist when someone pays you to take photos for private and domestic purposes, like a wedding, a family portrait or a newborn shoot. You still own the copyright, but the client has a legal right to privacy over those photos. You can't post them online, put them on your website or exhibit them without their permission.

So if you want to use them in your portfolio, ask in advance and get it in writing, ideally in your booking terms.

One more thing. Copyright isn't the same as permission from the people in the photo. If you want to use a recognisable person in an advert or on a product, get a model release, which is a separate signed form. Most brands won't touch a photo without one.

What If Someone Uses Your Photo Without Permission?

Start friendly. Most people genuinely don't know. Send a polite message asking them to credit you, take it down, or pay a fee for the use.

If that gets nowhere, England and Wales have a small claims track at the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court for claims under £10,000. It's set up for people without lawyers, and photographers use it a lot for unpaid use of their images.

This is where your negatives, your original scans and that email trail pay off.

So, What Should My Customer Do?

Here's where we landed:

  • Send the finished, high res file. Not the negatives.
  • Put the terms in an email: personal and social media use with a credit, no edits, and the copyright stays with the photographer.
  • If the band want it printed, sell them a proper print rather than letting them print the file anywhere. Get it made somewhere good. I'd point you to Stampe, who are Norwich based but take orders online. Then add a fair markup for your time, charge for postage, and sign it.
  • If it ever ends up on an EP cover or a t-shirt, that's a new conversation and a new fee.

Everyone wins. The band get a great photo, the photographer gets the credit and a sale, and nobody falls out.

Useful Links

A quick note. I run a film lab, I'm not a solicitor. This is general information to help you understand where you stand, not legal advice. If there's real money or a big client involved, an hour with a proper IP solicitor is money well spent.

And if you've got rolls in a drawer with a few gems on them, send them in. We'll develop and scan them, and every bit of the copyright stays with you.